“I would like to challenge the very starting point of the empiricists’ philosophy. There are several conclusive refutations of empiricism. I will show the empiricist distinction between empirical and analytical knowledge to be plainly false and self-contradictory. [23] That will then lead us to…
Awesome post up over at Symbiartic on SciAm blogs. It’s all about science-themed graffiti. I posted a few here, but you should go check out the whole collection!
(via m834)
Neil deGrasse Tyson on children and grown-ups
To Consult
Plato (left) and Aristotle (Right)

From MIT’s Technology Review:
And yet there is an even bigger philosophical revolution waiting in the wings. The theory of computing is a philosophical minnow compared to the potential of another theory that is currently dominating thinking about computation.
At least, this is the view of Scott Aaronson, a computer scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Today, he puts forward a persuasive argument that computational complexity theory will transform philosophical thinking about a range of topics such as the nature of mathematical knowledge, the foundations of quantum mechanics and the problem of artificial intelligence.
More at the link….
Every newspaper has a science column - its called “the rest of the newspaper”. I wouldn’t want a counterpart column for science. Do you really want to be putting the term “science” on the same level as the term “astrology”?

